Please assist with this assignment. Please STRICTLY follow the attached rubric for this assignment. Thanks!

Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadlines.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Please assist with this assignment. Please STRICTLY follow the attached rubric for this assignment. Thanks!

Please assist with this assignment. Please STRICTLY follow the attached rubric for this assignment. Thanks!
IHP 355 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric Overview: In Milestone One, y ou will first complete an analysis of regulations and compliance in regards to a given department or system within a healthca re institution. You will demonstrate a foun dational knowledge based on healthcare regulations and their relationship with institutional operations. Prompt: Based on the scenario given in the Final Project Document and your selection of the identified issue , and u sing the SUNY Downstate Medical Center Safety Plan for reference , submit a draft of your analysis of the regulation(s) that address the safety issue you chose in the given scenario. Your anal ysis should include the identifi cation of health care regulations or accreditation standards related to the safety issue and the analysis of their impact on the given organization. In addition, you should discuss similarities and differences of the federal and state regulations, explain how they inform deemed status of healthcare organization’s key laws on the development of health care regulations or accreditation standards and their implications. Scenario : You walk into the intensive care unit. There are no patients or family members s itting in the chairs; the patients in bed are on ventilators, attached to all kinds of tubes. The nurses are dressed in various colors of scrub suits. You notice two sedated patients on ventilators who have at least one side rail down on the bed. One of th ese beds is also elevated. Tubes are visibly seen attached to machines for monitoring and maintaining physiologic functions s uch as blood pressure, oxygen levels, and nutritional support. No labels are noted on the tubing. Patient armbands are taped to the side rails instead of to the patient. In a rush to take care of multiple patient needs, nurses go from one room to another with gloves on. The noise level consists of alarms going off intermittently, the whir and hum of machines, and the spoken technica l jargon of staff. The physicians and nurses are talking in a language that is specialized in their area. “Mr. Smith has multifocal PVCs (premat ure ventricular contractions) and PCWPs (pulmonary capillary wedge pressures) are high. Mr. Smith is hypotensiv e, tachycardiac, and is receiving titrating IV medications to increase urine output and blood pressure.” There are observable clusters of care in the intensive care unit. As the physicians round with the nurses and ancillary staff , the language of each sp ecialty is heard. There is an urgency and quickness of pace. Emergent care interrupts the rounds, and the attending physician, residents , and nurses rush to the bedside of a patient who has “coded.” Case Study Reference : Patient Safety and Hospital Accred itation: A Model for Ensuring Success Sharon Ann Myers Copyright 2011, Reproduced with the permission of Springer Publishing Company, LLC ISBN: 978 -0-8261 -0639 -1 Case Scenario Issue: After reading the scenario, you will choose a specific issue which is identified as a patient safety concern. You will target your analysis based on the issue you choose below. Remember that your analysis of the regulation(s) should just be the regulations and standards associated with t he specific issue you have chosen.  Iss ue One: Potential for falls for patients  Issue Two: Potential for harm to the patient due to tubing not being labeled  Issue Three: Potential for harm to the patient due to disorganization of care and miscommunication  Issue Four: Potential for harm to the p atient or medicine errors due to patient identifier policy not being followed Specifically , the following critical elements must be addressed: I. Analysis of Regulations : In this section , you will analyze the regulation and accreditation standards that impa ct the given scenario. Be sure to: A. Identify appropriate healthcare regulations or accreditation standards that would apply to the department or institutional system from the given scenario. B. Analyze the impact your identifi ed health care regulations or acc reditation standards could have on the daily operation and clinical practice of the department or system. C. Explain the influence of key laws on the development of health care regulations or accreditation standards you have researched or reviewed. Key laws c ould include but not be limited to: HIP AA, EMTALA, ACA, etc. Be sure to provide examples to support your response. D. Determine key similarities and differences between federal and state healthcare regulations or accrediting standards that would apply to the department or system. For example, how might HIPPA be similar to an applicable state regulation? Different? E. Analyze federal and state healthcare regulations or accrediting standards for how they inform deemed statu s of healthcare organizations. In other w ords, what regulations and standards must be met? F. Explain the implications of deemed status as it relates to healthcare regulations or accreditation standards that would apply to the institution or system . In other words, what is the importance of deemed status? How would it apply to and affect your department or system (or the institution)? Guidelines for Submission: This milestone should adhere to the follo wing format ting requirements: 3–4 pages, double -spaced, all references cited in APA format . Rubr ic Critical Elements Proficient (100% ) Needs Improvement (75% ) Not Evident (0% ) Value Analysis of Regulations: Healthcare Regulations or Accreditation Standards Identifies ap propriate health care regulations or accreditation standards that would apply to the department or institutional system from the given scenario Identifies healthcare regulations or accreditation standards that would apply to the department or institutional system from the given scenario, but identification is inaccurate or illogical Does not identify healthcare regulations or accreditation standards that would apply to the department or institutional system from the given scenario 15 Analysis of Regulations: Daily Operation Analyzes impact identified healthcare regulations or accredi tation standards could have on the daily operation and clinical practice of the department or system Analyzes the impact identified healthcare regulations or accreditation standards could have on the daily operation and clinical practice of the department or system, but analysis is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or is illogical Does not analyze impact identified healthcare regulations or accreditation standards could have on the daily operation and clinical practice of the department or system 15 Analysis of Regulations: Key Laws Explains the influence of key laws on the development of healthcare regulations or accreditation standards, supporting response with examples Explains the influence of key laws on the development of healthcare regulations or accr editation standards , but explanation is cursory, illogical, or is not supported with examples Does not explain the influence of key laws on the development of healthcare regulations or accreditation standards 15 Analysis of Regulations: Similarities and Differences Determines key similarities and differences between federal and state healthcare regulations or accrediting standards that would apply to the department or system Determines key similarities and differences between federal and state healthcare regulations or accrediting standards that would apply to the department or system, but response is illogical or contains inaccuracies Does not determine key similarities and differences between federal and state healthcare regulations or accrediting standa rds that would apply to the department or system 15 Analysis of Regulations: Deemed Status Analyzes federal and state healthcare regulations or accrediting standards for how they inform deemed status of healthcare organizations Analyzes federal and state healthcare regulations or accrediting standards for how they inform deemed status of healthcare organizations , but analysis is illogical or contains inaccuracies Does not analyze federal and state healthcare regulations or accrediting standards for how they inform deemed status of healthcare organizations 15 Analysis of Regulations: Implications Explains the implications of deemed status as it relates to health care regulations or accreditation standards that would apply to the institution or system Expla ins the implications of deemed status as it relates to health care regulations or accreditation standards that would apply to the institution or system, but explanation is cursory, illogical, or contains inaccuracies Does not explain the implications of dee med status as it relates to health care regulations or accreditation standards that would apply to the institution or system 15 Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submiss ion has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that pre vent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW
Writerbay.net

Need help with an assignment? We work for the best interests of our clients. We maintain professionalism and offer brilliant writing services in most of the fields ranging from nursing, philosophy, psychology, biology, finance, accounting, criminal justice, mathematics, computer science, among others.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper