Case study creation and summary of stages

Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadlines.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Details:

Part 1: Create a Case Study

Create a case study, 250-500-words involving a fictitious couple experiencing the stages and characteristics of romantic relationships. Think of this case study as a “story” that you are telling about the process the couple goes through when building a relationship.

Do not use any personal information or information related to current cases you are working on.

Part 2: Summary of Each Stage

After completing the case study, write a 250-500 word summary in which you explain each stage the couple experienced, including the characteristics associated with each.

Include at least three scholarly references in your paper.

Submit the case study and the summary as one document.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

40.0 %Case study involving a fictitious couple experiencing the stages and characteristics of romantic relationships

Does not create a case study involving a fictitious couple experiencing the stages and characteristic of romantic relationships.

Provides a case study involving a fictitious couple experiencing the stages and characteristic of romantic relationships, but the information provided in the case study is inaccurate or irrelevant to the stages of romantic relationships.

Provides a case study involving a fictitious couple experiencing, the stages and characteristics of romantic relationships. The different stages are briefly, but accurately incorporated into the case study.

Provides a thorough case study involving a fictitious couple experiencing, the stages and characteristics of romantic relationships. Each stage is adequately incorporated and clearly addressed.

Provides a thorough case study involving a fictitious couple experiencing, the stages and characteristics of romantic relationships. Each stage is adequately incorporated and clearly addressed. Student illustrates an advanced understanding of the stages a couple experiences while building a romantic relationship.

30.0 %Explain each stage the couple experienced, including the characteristics associated with each.

Does not explain each stage the couple experienced, including the characteristics associated with each.

Explains each stage the couple experienced, including the characteristics associated with each, but the information provided is inaccurate or irrelevant.

Provides a cursory description of Explains each stage the couple experienced, including the characteristics associated with each.

Provides a thorough description of Explains each stage the couple experienced, including the characteristics associated with each.

Provides a thorough description of Explains each stage the couple experienced, including the characteristics associated with each. Student illustrates a clear understanding of the stages and their defining characteristics.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW
Writerbay.net

Need help with an assignment? We work for the best interests of our clients. We maintain professionalism and offer brilliant writing services in most of the fields ranging from nursing, philosophy, psychology, biology, finance, accounting, criminal justice, mathematics, computer science, among others.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper